|
12-01-2006, 23:29 | #1 |
**?!**
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 46
Posts: 505
|
Nuclear facilities
What do you think of Iran's nuclear facilities ?
I see many countries dont wanna let Iran has this kind of facilities even those top countries. Why do they find it dangerous ? |
~~~~~~~~~~~
We're all mad in our own way. |
|
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2006, 23:45 | #2 |
iMod
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839
|
Because countries that already have nuclear capabilities do not like to see other countries acquiring that technology, they want to feel superior and special. Originally only the 5 permanent members of the UN security council had nuclear capabilities, and they would have liked if things had remained that way since it gave them a tremendous power over all other countries.
Iran being a sovereign country, i personally think that Iran has the right to develop its nuclear program as it wants, it's an internal matter and no other country should interfere. However, things being what they are at the moment (only one superpower that no-one can challenge), it is likely that Iran will be bombed by the US in the coming months and its nuclear facilities destroyed. |
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ] |
|
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2006, 23:48 | #3 | ||
Ice_Cream
|
Quote:
EDIT: Quote:
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*" PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ] My music playlist on Last.fm |
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2006, 23:49 | #4 |
Sad Little Monkey
|
Because it can be disasterous in the wrong hands... which is basically ANYONE'S hands. ... but that goes double for a country as politically extreme as Iran. Not to mention it represents a huge potential to make political threats to people you don't like - so a rather dangerous bargaining chip.
No ofence xmad, but I think the question you're asking is ridiculous. Borderline rhetorical. |
~~~~~~~~~~~
freddie | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ multyman@hotmail.com ] Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. |
|
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2006, 23:50 | #5 | |
Ice_Cream
|
Quote:
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*" PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ] My music playlist on Last.fm |
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2006, 23:56 | #6 |
Sad Little Monkey
|
In the perfect world... I'd disarm everyone's nukes. But that's hardly happening anytime soon (it is a distant plan though). So we have an extremist country like Iran who's president made open remarks about how Israel shouldn't exist, going as far as to question the holocaust, wanting to build their own nuke program. Yeah... not exactly the rigth step towards the world stability. And this has NOTHING to do with the existing countries with nuclear capabilities, or their "advantage" over the rest of the world. It's about common sense. Iran & nukes = nono.
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
freddie | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ multyman@hotmail.com ] Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. |
|
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 00:06 | #7 | |
Ice_Cream
|
Quote:
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*" PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ] My music playlist on Last.fm |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 00:08 | #8 | ||
**?!**
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 46
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
People in Iran think this means another war. Quote:
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~
We're all mad in our own way. Last edited by xmad; 13-01-2006 at 00:34. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 00:10 | #9 | |
iMod
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839
|
Quote:
But once again, we see here a perverted side effect of the illegal invasion of Iraq. What did the Iranian leaders see? North Korea > crazy and extremely dangerous dictator > has nuclear capabilities > is totally left alone by the US and can do whatever he wants Iraq > irritating but not very dangerous dictator > does not have nuclear capabilities > is invaded and destroyed by the US Conclusion? To be left alone by the US you need to acquire nuclear capabilities as fast as possible. |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ] |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 00:15 | #10 | |
**?!**
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 46
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
I dont agree with Iran regime but the current situation isnt fair at all. |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
We're all mad in our own way. |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 00:34 | #11 |
Sad Little Monkey
|
Did they ALLOW North Korea? North Korea never ASKED anyone. Nor will Iran. The difference is Iran doesn't want to be as isolated from the international community as North Korea. I agree that no country should have it but it's still the neccesary evil of the 21st century. IAEA isn't as concerned as Pakistan's or Israel's capabilities, yet it's rather concerned with North Korea's development in that respect. And what it DOESN'T need is another North Korea to worry about...
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
freddie | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ multyman@hotmail.com ] Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. |
|
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 00:48 | #12 | |
**?!**
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 46
Posts: 505
|
Quote:
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
We're all mad in our own way. |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 00:57 | #13 | |
iMod
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839
|
Quote:
Iran totally has the right to develop nuclear power plants to power its population. |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ] |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 01:10 | #14 |
Sad Little Monkey
|
US and the former USSR developed their nuclear programs during the cold war days. It was a matter of super-power watching over one another.
Sure... Iran can develop their nuclear program... no one can really say no to them directly. But if they want to be taken seriously and not get into conflicts with the international community (like NK did many times before), it shouldn't. It is my opinion Iran's nuklear program would cause further destabilisation in that delicate part of the world. And that's like rubbing salt to the wounds. |
~~~~~~~~~~~
freddie | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ multyman@hotmail.com ] Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. |
|
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 14:15 | #15 | ||
Участник
|
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: I am not suggesting that nuclear technology should be used by either of these two neighboring countries nor am I saying that nuclear capabilities are good to have. |
||
~~~~~~~~~~~
Zelda [ yvfootie7@hotmail.com ] Last edited by zelda05; 13-01-2006 at 14:26. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 14:24 | #16 | |
Ice_Cream
|
Quote:
It's like teenagers that go out with knifes. Lots do it because they fear others have them, so they want to protect themselves. But the others have them because they know others have them and they want to protect themselves aswell. So fear causes chaos. They are their own worst enemies. I just want peace in the world, but of course we know while there are maniacs ruling countries taht will never happen |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*" PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ] My music playlist on Last.fm |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 14:33 | #17 | ||
Участник
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~
Zelda [ yvfootie7@hotmail.com ] |
|||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 16:25 | #18 | |
iMod
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839
|
Quote:
India did not acquire nuclear weapons because of Pakistan though, but because of China. India and China have been historical enemies for centuries. To this day, even though India and China share one of the longest border in the world, they do not recognize a single km of it and have many border disputes (including Chinese and Indian border guards shooting regularly at each other). Indians still have the Mongol invasion of India in mind, and they see a possible attack from China as a totally credible threat (and the invasion of Tibet by China has shown that this is not an imaginary threat), so when China got nuclear weapons, India had to get them too to reestablish a "balance of terror" in the region. India do not see Pakistan as an enemy exactly, after all Pakistanis are just muslim Indians, it's more like a familly quarrel. It's actually China that provided Pakistan with nuclear weapons, precisely to shift the "balance of terror" in their favor. The goal of the Chinese was to create a second nuclear threat for India so the "balance of terror" would be broken and India would be in a weakened position, and it worked perfectly. Now India is alone and has to worry about 2 nuclear threats which makes the situation much more unstable than it used to be when India and China were in a deadlock. Now in the Middle East it should also be a question of balance, Israel has nuclear weapons and is totally backed by the US, Middle Eastern countries know that Israel and the US can destroy them, but of course they can't destroy Israel or the US. If Iran had nuclear weapons, it would create some balance between Israel and the rest of the region since each side would know that the other can destroy them. |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ] |
||
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 17:26 | #19 |
The Black and Blue Wizard
|
the trouble is the new Iran President
In fact he want come back at the time of Islamic Revolution by Khoiemi |
~~~~~~~~~~~
IT'S REVENGE'S TIME!: Ho preso pali,mi hanno date buche,mi hanno defraudato e tradito ma ora miei cari BASTA!!E TEMPO DI VENDETTA! (J.B) |
|
Reply With Quote |
13-01-2006, 18:32 | #20 | |||||
Участник
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
.... well informed! |
|||||
~~~~~~~~~~~
Zelda [ yvfootie7@hotmail.com ] |
||||||
Reply With Quote |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA - General discussion (Part 1) | Kate | Politics and Science | 1013 | 26-01-2007 14:01 |
Catastrophy in Asia | QueenBee | Politics and Science | 39 | 26-01-2005 01:26 |