|
18-05-2006, 17:52 | #21 | |
Primetime Anchor
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden/France
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,954
|
Quote:
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Olga | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ ritzer@hotmail.com ] Latest News: | Tatu gallery | Current News | News Archive |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-05-2006, 18:02 | #22 |
Обезьянки / Null & Void
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Big brother House!
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,322
|
Car accidents?,, there's no relation between both,,,,, I mean you can see it everywhere,,, everytime,,,,there are lots of accidents,,, sometimes it's not your own fault,,,, I mean,,,, . It's just that you don't go out saying,,, well, today I'm buying cigaretes, some cheese and,, oh, why not an accident?????,,, Having a baby is something you're sure you want to do.....(at least it's better that way), sometimes women at 50 get pregnant artificially,, and they know what's the danger, which not only compromise her life but also her children's life,,, yeah, they're willing to risk it,,, but ,,, would their children think it's ok?????
|
Reply With Quote |
18-05-2006, 18:04 | #23 | |
Primetime Anchor
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden/France
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,954
|
Quote:
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Olga | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ ritzer@hotmail.com ] Latest News: | Tatu gallery | Current News | News Archive |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-05-2006, 18:26 | #24 |
Martian Eyes
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Linz, Austria
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,197
|
Medicine is getting better and better. Most problems with genetics and health can be controlled very good nowadays. So I don't think this is a very strong argument against pregnancy above 50. The social aspects have to be considered by the parents, but I am sure that most people who decide for a child at this age do this.
If we begin to define which woman should have a baby and who not, we will end with less than 5 percent of women being 'allowed' to have one. Sorry, that does not appeal to me. |
Reply With Quote |
18-05-2006, 18:40 | #25 | |
pie crust
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: where everybody knows my name
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,792
|
Quote:
Also, I think the fact that she is old doesn't mean she can't be a good mom... I've seen plenty of young mothers who should never have given birth. In my opinion the biggest problem is what can happen to the child itself (like others mentioned in this thread). |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
Monika | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ <3 ] [ 11 ] |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-05-2006, 20:05 | #26 |
Sad Little Monkey
|
Modern medicine is fairly succesful at predicting pre-natal birth defects as the fetus develops from early stages, so the pregnancy can be aborted in those first few weeks if problems are detected.
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
freddie | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ multyman@hotmail.com ] Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. |
|
Reply With Quote |
19-05-2006, 03:56 | #27 |
The Dream is Over, :~(
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 682
|
I voted yes.
After all; her body, her choice. |
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 20:29 | #28 |
Прохожий
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6
|
no, come on guys, it's obvious that not!! this is just not possible that that kid would be healthy. and how her body would stand a childbirth? and finally, she would be his/her mom and would look like grandmom..
anyway, that's her choice, but I'm surprised that the doctors agreed for this p.s. ekhm, what will be the kind of impregnation? her husband will do it himself? |
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 20:31 | #29 |
My Waking Hour
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: in oblivion
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,487
|
I can't see a reason why they shouldn't.
|
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 21:01 | #30 | |
(in)dependent
|
Quote:
Anyway, I still voted no. I agree with Rachel, and the ones who agreed with her (=P). I mean, if the woman wants to take the risk and have a baby, so be it. However, I think she shouldn't. For all the reasons already explained. |
|
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 21:23 | #31 |
Green Eyed Demon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Socialist hell: Norway
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,302
|
As there is a restriction for when you're allowed to have a baby (in norway: 16 years old) I honestly believe there should be an upper limit as well (I have no idea what it would be tho). After the woman's age of 25-30, the risks of any damages to the little one increases dramatically. After what I know (I'm not scientist or know-it-all on the field, however my old science teacher told me that the best age for having children was when the woman is between 16-20 years old. I'm thinking someone who's over 50 will put a lot of unecessary risks on the baby, as there will be big chances of disnormalities when it's born.
The fact that the kid will lose his/her parents while he's/she's still young isn't really a problem. Of course it's very sorry for him/her, but it's something one can get over after a litte while. It's not a permanent problem... If it becomes a problem he/she can get help to put it behind him/her. I dunno really. It's not the issue I've digged myself the most into. I'm saying no, because of the risks, however, I think she's entitled every right to have a baby. Adoption is a superb alternative! |
~~~~~~~~~~~
What I Think Tank I have started a blog that aims to concentrate its content on politics, economics and history, with a keen interest in American politics and the American tradition of Libertarianism and Austrian Economics. |
|
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 21:42 | #32 | |
Прохожий
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
I think that this woman is selfish, too selfish,she thinks only about herself, she wants to have baby and she have to get it no matter what. she don't thing of the needs of this poor kid or of his future. that's why she shouldn't get it. but, that's my opinion, of course you can disagree |
|
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 21:50 | #33 |
(in)dependent
|
I don't disagree with you, just with the doctors disagreeing thing. (If you know what I mean xP)
They have to do anything that is in their hand to bring the baby safe. And to keep the mother alive. No matter what the chances of them both dying are. That's what I think, at least o.o |
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 21:54 | #34 |
Прохожий
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6
|
I think I understand. and that's why I think that they should consider this one more time..but well, this is England, everything is possible there
|
Reply With Quote |
27-05-2006, 22:23 | #35 |
Участник
|
of course they should, since all kind of younger woman can why not older too.
but world would be a much better place, if everyone had to satisfy some criteria before having kids , but that will never happen.. |
~~~~~~~~~~~
pogledaj da li me mozes presnimiti |
|
Reply With Quote |
28-05-2006, 07:58 | #36 |
**?!**
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 46
Posts: 505
|
Of course it's not ok for women over 50 to have children.
I'm totally against this. 1st: it's really risky. 2nd: having children needs so much responsibilities.how are they gonna raise the child at that old age? There will be a huge generation gap between them so how they're gonna understand each other? and how many years they have to live. I think someone who does this kind of childish or even selfish things is not mature enough, no matter how old they are. |
~~~~~~~~~~~
We're all mad in our own way. |
|
Reply With Quote |
28-05-2006, 17:06 | #37 | |
Green Eyed Demon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Socialist hell: Norway
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,302
|
Quote:
The problem is the risks before and while giving birth to the little one: The old lady will give the baby high risks of permanent disnormalities and problems that it will struggle with for the rest of his/her life. This can be pretty serious, and not something the mother should risk putting on her child. That's the only problem in my opinion, but it's a huge one. |
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
What I Think Tank I have started a blog that aims to concentrate its content on politics, economics and history, with a keen interest in American politics and the American tradition of Libertarianism and Austrian Economics. |
||
Reply With Quote |
03-06-2006, 22:46 | #38 |
Обезьянки / Null & Void
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Big brother House!
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,322
|
Then what's the most recomended age to have children , anybody has an idea????, we all know that having childrean at 15 or 16 is not, maybe in Royal families to continue with the blood line it is (well, it's not now in). My mom had me at 28,,,,
|
Reply With Quote |
03-06-2006, 23:04 | #39 | |
Green Eyed Demon
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Socialist hell: Norway
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,302
|
Obezyanki -
Quote:
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
What I Think Tank I have started a blog that aims to concentrate its content on politics, economics and history, with a keen interest in American politics and the American tradition of Libertarianism and Austrian Economics. |
||
Reply With Quote |
03-06-2006, 23:16 | #40 | |
Обезьянки / Null & Void
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Big brother House!
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,322
|
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are women ocasionally leaning on "the other side"? | Obie | Personal and Acquaintances | 20 | 03-05-2006 20:09 |
Women do it better | Lux | Politics and Science | 3 | 22-04-2006 09:04 |
Women and men are genetically different. | haku | General discussions | 14 | 09-08-2004 20:42 |
Safety tips for women | ypsidan04 | General discussions | 16 | 17-11-2003 14:51 |
Women kissing women | Lux | General discussions | 6 | 23-07-2003 23:17 |