Ok then...*pretends to be able to read you like a book* :rolleyes:
|
i won't direct this at anyone but, when people state things as assumptions of what queer women think as a whole or even a portion of them, i don't see how that is observation. it's saying what YOU (not you but whoever says it) think they think, without every knowing. i am NOT saying i know, because i know jack shit. but as someone more inclined to be similar to queer women in a few respects, i can relate better. i can maybe even relate more, but in general i can relate better.
|
Offtop:
If you're not directing at anyone then you might aswell not say it. *Really doesn't get your post* :bum: |
Quote:
|
i dont think it is social commentary when you try to get inside the minds of groups as a whole without much experience or exposure to them. or without even studying them, objectively. for example, i don't try to say what black people think because i know little about them and what they think, and what they've experienced. i can throw numbers around and analyze research and data but that's it. that is all i'm saying. it is not social commentary when people try to get inside the minds of a group they are far and few from and try to assume what they think, without really knowing.
and please. if i directed it at someone i would be 1. banned 2. ridiculed 3. harassed 4. disliked and well, 5. banned. directing it at someone is no good on this forum, i've been here long enough to have learned that. Quote:
how did genitalia even come into question? lol it is probably true, as it is a generalization, but it seems ridiculous. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I don't think Amber was trying to get inside the minds of groups of people. I think he just expressed his opinion on the matter. Maybe in a contraversial but still non-offensive way. If we start going down that road no one willl be free to say ANYTHING anymore without brushing the thin line of political correctness. Chill out a bit. You can still express and explain your counter-opinions, proving him wrong, if you so please.
|
i thought you were doing it, not amber. but again, *thought = past tense. lets *try* to have a debate instead of a heated mess.
|
Quote:
|
1. i didn't ask.
2. it just annoyed me, a tiny bit, tiny. tiny is key here but i am over it. 3. see what i mean? i didn't ask it, and if it is interpreted as such, oh well. but that was not the point of it. and certainly not the reason behind it. |
Quote:
So... social commentary... more insights anyone? :D |
Can we still talk about genitalia?... I'd really like that.
Offtop: Amber's a dude? I'm so sorry, I had no idea! |
Wow, I could smell the bullshit in this thread all the way from Livejournal. :spy:
|
in the scene here at nyc, i give up. i give up cause there is no point whatsoever. and if you want a good time here in the city hit me up but it is a waste of fucking time.
|
Quote:
:cocttail: |
1. i like girls who are girls, not girls who look like guys/arefat/chubby/weirdlooking
2. there aren't many girls like that who are OUT int he scene here 3. so i am not the one full of shit because ppl here have seen the scene in LA and there are far more pretty girls there than here. Offtop: this belongs in the daily troubles thread:hmmm: |
Wait... are you talking about the same NYC? A bustling metropolis with over 21 million people? I'm sorry but eventhough I have no insight on the matter something tells me there really ought to be some drop dead gorgeous lesbians/bisexuals in the mix there.
|
Quote:
2. there aren't because girls are not OUT. i mean, the ones who show up in the lesbian scene are fully comfortable and open. many, many girls aren't. i mean, most girls aren't. the ones who are out are aware, and gayer than gay. 3. there aren't drop dead gorgeous lesbian or bi girls 4. the percentage of decent girls i.e. non butch/mannish/old/fat/weird is small. like 25% on a good night, usually less. 5. i know a few promoters in the scene, who throw lesbian parties and have been around for years. they know everything to everything. and i've partied with them nearly every day for the past week. trust me. there isn't much. mostly because girls aren't OUT like guys are out. and they shouldn't be..but that's another story. |
/me is confused :o
|
Offtop:
You're not the only one :bum: |
Offtop:
Same here... There aren't any nice looking girls because none of them are out? All the good-looking lesbians are in the closet? Or what are you saying? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.