Unofficial site of group TATU


Unofficial forum of group TATU
Go Back   Unofficial forum of group TATU General Forum General discussions


Gay marriage/Interracial marriage


ReplyPost New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 18-06-2004, 18:14   #21
nath nath is offline
Участник
 
nath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Paris
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,104

Send a message via ICQ to nath Send a message via MSN to nath Send a message via Skype™ to nath
Quote:
Originally Posted by cirrus
I don't think we would really become one giant human race, but if it happened, it would be a shame. Some of the variety between humans would be lost, and that just wouldn't feel right.
Of course, i'm not saying interracial relationships are wrong. I'm just saying that, from Kate's point of view, I agree that having one racial group is quite a disappointment.
So, may be we could just keep Kate and Yourself as "pure specimens"and close you in a scientific laboratory...like that the race would be safe thanks to you..and all the other people could live as they feel without counsciousness problems!...
Please Cirrus , you could make this Sacrifice !.....In the name of SCIENCE!!!!...it's without prize!.....
No...don't be scarred...just kidding !
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 18:35   #22
nath nath is offline
Участник
 
nath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Paris
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,104

Send a message via ICQ to nath Send a message via MSN to nath Send a message via Skype™ to nath
Okay .... ..was just kidding..don't worry.... And even if it was the case , after we would get the "under-categories"....the ones of the mixed race who have long feet and the ones who have short feet, and so on....
So , don't worry the Human Mind would have always enough imagination to classify people ...just because making selections is a part of the human nature....Look at the young babies : they are not kind and generous at the origine...they learn to share and to be kind with the education ..it isn't innate, inborn...
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 18:40   #23
cirrus cirrus is offline
viva la scientology!
 
cirrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: surrounded by lunatics!
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,228

sunwalk, yeah, you're right. Humans will make other distinctions between people. Sometimes for good, but also for bad. That's a shame. I'm not saying it's important to have distinctions. I was only saying that I love all the variety and possible combinations of races, and I just would be saddened to see that go away one day. I'm beginning to doubt that we would completely lose all races. That seems impossible. And now i'm a little embarassed by my posts, but oh well

~~~~~~~~~~~
la profundidad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 18:54   #24
nath nath is offline
Участник
 
nath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Paris
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,104

Send a message via ICQ to nath Send a message via MSN to nath Send a message via Skype™ to nath
But it's good to be frank when you find the good and correct words to say it....to try to not hurt the others...it's important to be frank with itself and the others...so don't be embarrassed...
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 19:29   #25
haku haku is offline
iMod
 
haku's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839

Personally, i totally oppose the idea that human "races" exist.

Animal races are the result of the artificial selection of particular species during hundreds or thousands of years. There are no races in the wild, only animals bred by humans have races.

I don't accept the theory that humans have applied an artificial selection to themselves, to me there are no human races, only one human species.

Furthermore, there are no such thing as a "pure" human "race". The human species appeared in Africa several millions of years ago, all humans are descendants of that original group. The fact that there are so many different human groups on the planet now can actually be seen as a very "unpure" situation, blending all human groups that currently exist on the planet into one would actually take us closer to the original "purity".

Anyway, we are not cats or horses whose races have to be kept pure because of whatever usage we have for them.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ]
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 19:34   #26
teeny teeny is offline
you'll need love
 
teeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Taastrup, Denmark
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,298

Quote:
Originally Posted by haku
Anyway, we are not cats or horses whose races have to be kept pure because of whatever usage we have for them.
and look what happens to pure cats and dogs: they go mad, have to be fed to survive or bones go crazy. Really glad that I'm a mixture of most cultures and species.. whatever
~~~~~~~~~~~
Don't waste your time on me you're already
the voice inside my head
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 20:04   #27
rosh rosh is offline
winter days ...
 
rosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: L WorLd
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,787

my experience with thoroughbred animals ... esp dogs :

my one puppy was so inbred that she died 10 days after i got her, due to a weak immune system and inability to fight an illness she had before i even got her.

in my own family [fathers side] -- so much inbreeding takes place that the children are now being born with birth defects - faulty heart valves , downs syndrome, etc etc. there have even been a few deaths as a result.

draw your own conclusions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 20:34   #28
teeny teeny is offline
you'll need love
 
teeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Taastrup, Denmark
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,298

Quote:
Originally Posted by rosh
draw your own conclusions.
Thats sad. Really sad. My brother has a heart malfunction. It's nothing really serious, but he used it to avoid being forced to join the army for a year (and ever). Don't think it's because of genes though. It's just because my parents was in a hurry durring the creation proces I tease him with
~~~~~~~~~~~
Don't waste your time on me you're already
the voice inside my head
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2004, 20:37   #29
rosh rosh is offline
winter days ...
 
rosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: L WorLd
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,787

Quote:
Originally Posted by teeny
Thats sad. Really sad. My brother has a heart malfunction. It's nothing really serious, but he used it to avoid being forced to join the army for a year (and ever). Don't think it's because of genes though. It's just because my parents was in a hurry durring the creation proces I tease him with

i can blame interbreeding for a number of things i suffer from as well. i wont mention what they are as that in itself is irrelevant. im just grateful my father didnt end up marrying one of his cousins as well or who knows what else could have gone wrong. one of my half sisters died as a very young child, from an inherited disorder she got from my father ... something which he passed on to every single daughter of his. too bad it was only discovered after she was already dead and my father had lost a child.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2004, 02:08   #30
ypsidan04 ypsidan04 is offline
********
 
ypsidan04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,156

Send a message via AIM to ypsidan04
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...05/EDMEYER.DTL

Take a careful look at what's going on in each square.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rosh
its bad enough youre gay ... but why are you going out with an indian ?!"
Nothing wrong with that. I know a White gay man who prefers Black men.
Quote:
Originally Posted by katbeidar
Marriage is ONLY for a man and a woman. Eng of story for me. Gay couples can have civil unions with identical rights as the married couples, just don't call their union "marriage". I don't know why. That's just how I feel.
If you see two ducks, and decide to call one duck a chicken, the fact still stands that they are both ducks.

Why bother with two names for the exact same thing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kr0k0
but, as i remember, there's nothing in the original God's or Jesus' words being against homosexuality, so, there is a little door for the church to escape through.
It's in Leviticus somewhere:

"Men shalt not lie with men. God hates that." (playing devil's advocate, and paraphrasing)

Kate: If you'll allow me to quote myself from something I said on another forum:

Quote:
In summary - "it's just a couple things they would gain, and therefore its not necessary." Not only is that not true, but if it were true, it still wouldn't matter. You know there's a huge difference between being able to call s/o your wife as opposed to just a girlfriend. Just that alone is enough reason.

"dont mess with something that has worked for 1000s of years" - Well clubbing a girl over the head and raping her worked for thousands of years too. But is that still legal?

Last edited by ypsidan04; 19-06-2004 at 02:26.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2004, 02:34   #31
Kate Kate is offline
Участник
 
Kate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London, UK
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,591

nataku, YLuelniaa,
Quote:
Your contridicting yourself...
I was just saying that it's a pity because the children of our children probably won't be able to see the diversity of the human race as we see it now. People will be of the same race. It's inavitable and it's a pity, but there's nothing wrong with it. Hope you understand what I was trying to say now.

teeny,
Quote:
You do like to alienate don't you? Why is it so important to make people stand out of a crowd? If people want to get married they should be able to do so. And there should be no new word introduced just bacause people want the same rights as a lot of people already have.
I know it's wrong of me to be so possessive about the term "marriage", and I know that you are right: everyone, gay or straight, should be allowed to get married. But that's just how I feel, and I admit that I am ashamed that I feel this way. Maybe it'll change as I grow up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2004, 03:09   #32
haku haku is offline
iMod
 
haku's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839

Quote:
Originally Posted by ypsidan04
Why bother with two names for the exact same thing?
I'm only going to speak for my country here, but maybe that applies to other countries too.

Here, the debate is not really about marriage itself, but about the rights that marriage gives to married couples, namely the rights to adoption and artificial insemination.

I think that marriage will be extended to same-sex couples in the not so distant future, so that homosexuals can have the same rights in terms of inheritance, social security, that kind of stuff... *but* i suspect the law will be modified so that adoption and artificial insemination are only available to opposite-sex couples.

So it will be the same name, but not the exact same thing.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ]
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004, 23:12   #33
ypsidan04 ypsidan04 is offline
********
 
ypsidan04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,156

Send a message via AIM to ypsidan04
Well, the United States Senate has begun discussions over the proposed Consitutional amendment to effectively ban same-sex marriage. They could reach a conclusion as soon as Wednesday.

Thankfully, it is quite hard to pass a Consitutional amendment. First it has to pass both the Senate and House of Reps. by a 2/3rds majority. Then it has to be ratified by 3/4ths of the States.

This should really be left up to the States however. Marriage is a state or even a county or city issue. The federal government has no business whatsoever with anything to do with marriage. But the reason they are probably doing this is that federal law currently says that States have to uphold and respect other States laws, if the State(s) in question don't have the same law. Meaning that all 49 other states currently have to recognize same sex marriages done in the state of Massachusetts, whether they want to or not - and of course they don't like this.

And I found Homo Prevention (this is a joke made by a website that makes fun of right-wing Christians )
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 00:49   #34
haku haku is offline
iMod
 
haku's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839

Quote:
Originally Posted by ypsidan04
Homo Prevention
Oh god... I do several of the things they mention as being gay...
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ]
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 05:28   #35
nath nath is offline
Участник
 
nath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Paris
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,104

Send a message via ICQ to nath Send a message via MSN to nath Send a message via Skype™ to nath
Quote:
Originally Posted by Originally Posted by ypsidan04
Homo Prevention
I just hope this a site is a joke.... ...if not, it looks more as a secte than as a normal site about religion...
Not only about this stupid test/recommandations... ...but too about its full entity...i don't feel faith in it just organisation of a mini sociey with terrible laws

EDIT: Oh i read again your post tonight.... ..an i'm happy to see it is just a joke!!! cause I was enough terrified....

Last edited by nath; 12-07-2004 at 22:39.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2004, 16:09   #36
ypsidan04 ypsidan04 is offline
********
 
ypsidan04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,156

Send a message via AIM to ypsidan04
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunwalk
I just hope this a site is a joke....
Trust me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13-07-2004, 20:41   #37
kr0k0 kr0k0 is offline
Участник
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Romania
Posts: 550

"If your boy has a young sister, forbid him from entering her room except for the purposes of the type of ordinary heterosexual experimentation that occurs in any Christian household."
  Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2004, 02:52   #38
ypsidan04 ypsidan04 is offline
********
 
ypsidan04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,156

Send a message via AIM to ypsidan04
Measure to Ban Same Sex Marriage defeated in Senate

The vote was 48 for, and 50 against. 60 yes votes were needed to advance to the House of Representatives. Six Republicans "crossed over" and voted "No".

This is definitely a blow to Bush, and the religious right in general, but it's not that big of a deal. They didn't even pass the first step to making an amendment. I'm just glad there won't be discrimination in the US Constitution anytime soon.

Some stupid Senator whose name I forget, but that's important, had this to say: "No one here wants to discriminate against gays and lesbians. We just want to protect an age old institution." (he wrongly assumes you can do one without doing the other. )

http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=3...s_and_Lesbians
  Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2004, 13:17   #39
rosh rosh is offline
winter days ...
 
rosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: L WorLd
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,787

Quote:
Originally Posted by haku
Oh god... I do several of the things they mention as being gay...

which things ? *curious*
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2009, 04:59   #40
Endri Endri is offline
Postmodern
 
Endri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 998

My country is going to legalize the marriage between people of same sex. It has caused a lot of complains from common people and it has been created a very annoying atmosphere.
  Reply With Quote
ReplyPost New Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge Strikes Down CA Gay Marriage Law madeldoe Politics and Science 3 22-03-2005 05:08
You want marriage the way the Bible intended? Okay! ypsidan04 General discussions 3 21-08-2004 02:22
Quotes for and against equality ypsidan04 General discussions 17 22-07-2004 22:58
same sex marriage?? warx Personal and Acquaintances 27 01-06-2004 02:00
President Bush backs anti-gay marriage bill! Khartoun2004 General discussions 42 09-08-2003 23:36



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:36.




© 2001-2008 Unofficial site of group TATU

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.