Unofficial site of group TATU


Unofficial forum of group TATU
Go Back   Unofficial forum of group TATU General Forum Politics and Science


The big "P" Thread


ReplyPost New Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 31-05-2006, 22:11   #1
Rachel Rachel is offline
Ice_Cream
 
Rachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ипсщич, Суффолк, УК
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,831

Send a message via ICQ to Rachel Send a message via AIM to Rachel Send a message via MSN to Rachel Send a message via Yahoo to Rachel Send a message via Skype™ to Rachel
The big "P" Thread

I kinda agree with the bit about lowering the age you can appear in porn. I find it slightly weird that you can legally have sex but it's illegal to film it and sell it.

And I'm all for more animal rights.

But lowering the age of consent to 12? Nope, that's kinda fucked up.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*"

PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ]

My music playlist on Last.fm
  Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2006, 22:18   #2
spyretto spyretto is offline
My Waking Hour
 
spyretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: in oblivion
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,486

I was wondering if Paul de Leeuw is affiliated with the party in any way...just an idea.

Quote:
I kinda agree with the bit about lowering the age you can appear in porn. I find it slightly weird that you can legally have sex but it's illegal to film it and sell it.
I believe that has to do with representing yourself legally - i.e. be over 18 - and it's not an ethical question.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2006, 22:26   #3
Rachel Rachel is offline
Ice_Cream
 
Rachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ипсщич, Суффолк, УК
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,831

Send a message via ICQ to Rachel Send a message via AIM to Rachel Send a message via MSN to Rachel Send a message via Yahoo to Rachel Send a message via Skype™ to Rachel
I'm guessing lowering the age you can appear in it would also mean lowering the age you can buy it...which is another question that baffles me - you can legally have sex, but you can't buy a video showing it. Makes no sense to me.

Sorry...I know that's kinda off topic...ignore me!
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*"

PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ]

My music playlist on Last.fm
  Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2006, 23:11   #4
spyretto spyretto is offline
My Waking Hour
 
spyretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: in oblivion
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,486

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel
I'm guessing lowering the age you can appear in it would also mean lowering the age you can buy it...which is another question that baffles me - you can legally have sex, but you can't buy a video showing it. Makes no sense to me.

Sorry...I know that's kinda off topic...ignore me!
They're governed by two different types of laws. Possessing pornographic material is contract binding and hence belongs to the age of majority - not the age of consent. Lowering the age of appearing in pornographic material to under the age of majority for a contractual bond that involves two parties means that one party would be a minor. Thus, the one who needs to give their consent in that case would be the person's next of kin, and this can be seen as a form of prostitution.
But if you're talking about Britain, I believe the age of consent was only recently changed from 18 to 16 years, so there's a gap of 2 years. British pornographers are currently pursuing this case with the European court, in hopes that they can lower the age of possessing pornographic material to equate it with the age of consent.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31-05-2006, 23:26   #5
dradeel dradeel is offline
Green Eyed Demon
 
dradeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Socialist hell: Norway
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,302

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel
I'm guessing lowering the age you can appear in it would also mean lowering the age you can buy it...which is another question that baffles me - you can legally have sex, but you can't buy a video showing it. Makes no sense to me.

Sorry...I know that's kinda off topic...ignore me!
Might be kinda off topic, but still a good point. It's kinda like here in norway with booze. People can't buy and drink booze until they're 20, but when turning 18 we are legally adults, can vote, get driver's liscence, and generally are responsible for ourselves. --- but we can't buy drinks with more than 22% of alchohol or something. It's no problem for me to get really drunk and get violent or drink'n'drive by only drinking beer. The danger IS the same! Hehehe. If they are afraid of the possibility that we'll drink ourselves to death, why can we fire shotguns and hunting rifles, or even join the conscript military at the age of 19. I actually think we can use shotguns for hunt when we're 16. Not sure tho... But either way; where's the logic? Seriously, if I were the master of this planet, a LOT of things would be different. Hehehe.

And as for the party. Well, I do believe in the right for pedophiles, since it's a sexuality as all other. BUT: It's NOT their right to have sex with persons under the 'legal age for having sex'. What this party is doing is extreme. Lowering the legal age for sex will be very risky for kids .. I'm thinking about the danger of raping. -- Of course people can choose to have sex when they are under 16 (the legal age in norway), doing it all by their free will. But I actually think that kids at the age of 12 cannot make that decision. 14 would be more morally correct, but still that's kinda low.

Anyways, I didn't like this party ... except the fact that they wanted to legalize all forbidden drugs. All the other things were crap imo, really. Hehehe. I sure as hell wouldn't vote for them simply because of the legalization-issue tho.
~~~~~~~~~~~
What I Think Tank
I have started a blog that aims to concentrate its content on politics, economics and history, with a keen interest in American politics and the American tradition of Libertarianism and Austrian Economics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 09:29   #6
marina marina is offline
Re-Offender
 
marina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shanghai , China
Posts: 2,103

Quote:
Originally Posted by dradeel
And as for the party. Well, I do believe in the right for pedophiles, since it's a sexuality as all other. BUT: It's NOT their right to have sex with persons under the 'legal age for having sex'.
Yes , they should have right to the medical treatment but I'm not sure you mean exactly that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel
which is another question that baffles me - you can legally have sex, but you can't buy a video showing it
Because there is a difference !
You can have sex , your body is almost like grown-up's and such ..besides there is a chance (in the hell, --marina) you are truly -madly- totally in love with your future prince on a white horse
but pornography is entirely different issue . Pornography is not much for your body , that's more to do with your mind . And not everyone child's mind is strong ehough to withstand such a bullshit . Pornography is downright degrading anyway They won't miss much if they start to watch it only from 18 or 21

Last edited by marina; 01-06-2006 at 09:52.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 10:00   #7
Rachel Rachel is offline
Ice_Cream
 
Rachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ипсщич, Суффолк, УК
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,831

Send a message via ICQ to Rachel Send a message via AIM to Rachel Send a message via MSN to Rachel Send a message via Yahoo to Rachel Send a message via Skype™ to Rachel
Pornography is no more damaging to your mind than meaningless one night stands. Infact, it is probably better in my view.

Nothing wrong with porn, I've been watching it since I was 11
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*"

PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ]

My music playlist on Last.fm
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 10:38   #8
marina marina is offline
Re-Offender
 
marina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shanghai , China
Posts: 2,103

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel
Pornography is no more damaging to your mind than meaningless one night stands.
That's right ! I would ban sex at all
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 20:19   #9
spyretto spyretto is offline
My Waking Hour
 
spyretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: in oblivion
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,486

What on earth are you still discussing this about?
You're not an adult at 16 so you can't take part in pornographic films or be a prostitute. It's not an ethical or moral issue or physiological isue, it's a legal issue. Capisch?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 05:35   #10
PowerPuff Grrl PowerPuff Grrl is offline
The Dream is Over, :~(
 
PowerPuff Grrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 682

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel
you can legally have sex, but you can't buy a video showing it. Makes no sense to me.
I think it's about consent. People under the age limit are seen by the law as unable to give consent for whatever reason (for a child's ability to reason not being developed enough, or something like that). Like if a person has sex with an underaged teen, that teen cannot be held responsible for anything because the teen, according to the law, could not have given any consent. Instead the adult will be solely charged. Same goes for acquiring porn, the underaged buyer could purchase porn (or at least attempt to) but it is illegal for adults to sell any to children. Those that do will be prosecuted. Nobody would charge a kid wanting to buy Rocco's Anal Adventures through Eastern Europe. ***whew***


The only way for sex to be legal for an underaged kid would be if that kid was engaging it with another kid. And this Dutch political party is not underaged. (Lousy attempt at staying on topic.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 06:43   #11
nath nath is offline
Участник
 
nath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Paris
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,104

Send a message via ICQ to nath Send a message via MSN to nath Send a message via Skype™ to nath
About pornographic movies, a lot of kiddies see them anyway..with their big brother or friends ,in downloading them or just even at home because some parents really DON'T care about what is broadcasted or in their tapes...or just really don't care about their kiddies.

But I'm still For this interdiction and I explain why: just because when you're an adult you "can" see the difference between things....when you are a kiddie, not often...

I mean to sell their videos , the porn film makers push the extremes more and more ...
So to be more exciting you will get in this movies : rapes or parties with 6 persons....or all kinds of situations where you'll get absolutely no feeling but just sex relationships where the women would be treated just as objects in the most perverse and dangerous situations...

And I think that's very dangerous for the mind because when a 11 years old kiddie is watching such movies (and I know some kiddies who watch them when they are just 8 y.o. ), he is , in the same time, building its own personality, he is in the period when he is building his own references for the adult life.

The other thing to notice is that a lot of kiddies don't make difference between movies and reality...My idea about porn movies is the same than for violent movies here...

So...the consequence is that their representation of Love will be built from this pornographic movies...and it's very, very dangerous.
Because all the excess used to sell videos would become as something natural in their mind: for example, to rape a girl who doesn't want it in a basement with several guys would became a "natural thing"..a normal way to act...
Even the interpretation would be : "Oh! The girl cries and says "NO" just because she is a bitch and wants to excite us more.."...

So if you allow to give such horrible references to a kiddie as "normal relationships", I'm really afraid about the future of our civilization...
I don't see the necessity to "pollute" their brains with such horrible things in a such young age.

And I have the same opinion about violent videos and violent PC games....believe me, they don't make the difference between those referents and a "correct" reality which takes care about a respectful and sane relationship between people.

And about the fact to allow teens to play in Porn Movies...no thank you!!!
The role of society is to protect childhood during all the needed time to build "stable" adults.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 19:20   #12
PowerPuff Grrl PowerPuff Grrl is offline
The Dream is Over, :~(
 
PowerPuff Grrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 682

Quote:
Originally Posted by dradeel
Of course... doesn't that go for everyone tho? I mean, there isn't only pedophiles that feel urges they cannot control. Everyone have the right for help. - But aye, in some countries pedophelia is illegal - just like homo sexuality have been illegal (became legal in '72 in norway I think). I'm not sure if pedophelia is illegal anymore tho. Pedophile persons are always reckoned to be mentally ill all together and just thrown inside the bars, without anyone to have a dialogue with them or a health service that can help them in need.
Offtop:
Paedophilia and homosexuality shouldn't be compared, IMHO. Laws to illegalize homosexuality were based on some puritanical bullshit deeming both it and paedophilia as perverted. Homosexuality deals with two consenting adults, not so with paedophilia. As spyretto said, it comes down to what age should consent be recognized. You can't just lower it to appease paedophiles because the legal ramifications would be massive. By lowering the age of consent, the law would be implicating that the child is of able mind to do anything. If a child accidentally kills another person the child is tried as an adult for manslaughter, parents get no charges, labour laws (or lack of) that the children chimney sweepers of turn of the century England had can get re-enacted, etc. (All over-exagerations, but you get point.)

The law could have different ages for consent for sex, criminal charges, etc, but that would just make the law even more complicated than it already is. It isn't worth changing for a group of people that fetishize over children. It's the youth'ness, not the actual person, that they like. Children don't remain as children forever.


I completely agree with nath on the porn issue. The rampant misogyny featured in most porn is appalling. Women are treated as just orifices for guys to fuck. Rarely do you ever see a woman come in any of them, instead the porn ends when the guy comes. And he usually comes on the face of the woman which is unbelieveably demeaning. If there ever is a porn that does feature a woman coming then it is treated as some freak show thing, usually when the woman ejaculates.
And that is just porn from the States, nothing compared to the misogyny in Hentai (Japanese animated porn).

All this can have an unbelievlabley bad affect on children if they are ever exposed to this, which they are. There was news breakout in the States that told of an "epidemic" of 13 year olds having blow job parties. Most people were more concerned with the fact that children were having sex at all, which is rather naive. My concern is the fact that boys would have girls blow them but nobody would go down on the girls. Girls weren't enjoying sex, nor were expecting to enjoy it.

Obviously these children were getting their sex education from porn. Not that I'm blaming the porn industry for this, since sex education falls under the domain of the American education system. Or at least it should, seeing as the States is one of the most sex-crazed countries in the world, it's fucking criminal that they withhold teaching children about sex to appease hypocritical Christian fundmentalists.

Last edited by freddie; 02-06-2006 at 21:28.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 20:17   #13
freddie freddie is offline
Sad Little Monkey
 
freddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Slovenia
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,736

Send a message via AIM to freddie Send a message via MSN to freddie Send a message via Yahoo to freddie
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerPuff Grrl
Offtop:
I completely agree with nath on the porn issue. The rampant misogyny featured in most porn is appalling. Women are treated as just orifices for guys to fuck. Rarely do you ever see a woman come in any of them, instead the porn ends when the guy comes. And he usually comes on the face of the woman which is unbelieveably demeaning. If there ever is a porn that does feature a woman coming then it is treated as some freak show thing, usually when the woman ejaculates.
And that is just porn from the States, nothing compared to the misogyny in Hentai (Japanese animated porn).

All this can have an unbelievlabley bad affect on children if they are ever exposed to this, which they are. There was news breakout in the States that told of an "epidemic" of 13 year olds having blow job parties. Most people were more concerned with the fact that children were having sex at all, which is rather naive. My concern is the fact that boys would have girls blow them but nobody would go down on the girls. Girls weren't enjoying sex, nor were expecting to enjoy it.

Obviously these children were getting their sex education from porn. Not that I'm blaming the porn industry for this, since sex education falls under the domain of the American education system. Or at least it should, seeing as the States is one of the most sex-crazed countries in the world, it's fucking criminal that they withhold teaching children about sex to appease hypocritical Christian fundmentalists.
I understand all that, but there's more too it. With prohibiting anything we're basically telling our children that there are things out there which they wouldn't be able to understand properly. What we're doing is not trusting them to make up their own opinion on the matter. I think any healthy (and most of all thinking) individual will instictively see porn is NOT a real representation of life (just like James Bond movies aren't and everyone knows that... doesn't matter if they're 10 or 57). I think when you look at it, what it basically comes down to is us underestimating our children and their ability to paint their own proper image of subjective reality.
~~~~~~~~~~~
freddie | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ multyman@hotmail.com ]

Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

Last edited by freddie; 02-06-2006 at 21:28.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 20:45   #14
dradeel dradeel is offline
Green Eyed Demon
 
dradeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Socialist hell: Norway
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,302

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerPuff Grrl
Paedophilia and homosexuality shouldn't be compared, IMHO. Laws to illegalize homosexuality were based on some puritanical bullshit deeming both it and paedophilia as perverted. Homosexuality deals with two consenting adults, not so with paedophilia. As spyretto said, it comes down to what age should consent be recognized. You can't just lower it to appease paedophiles because the legal ramifications would be massive.
I didn't compare it like that. I was more talking about the fact that if someone say they are pedo they will be treated like mental patients, without doing a single thing. I never implied that they should have the same rights for living out their sexuality like hetero or homosexual people - since, as you say, is adult to adult. Pedophelia wouldn't work as children are innocent and can't be responsible for their actions, plus they can be brainwashed and talked into doing alot of stuff in the easiests of ways. I would never agree with lowering the legal sex age to a minimum as this Dutch Party wishes to. I actually said in the end that I disagreed with them and that they are too extreme. All I'm saying is that society treat them unfairly... NOT by stopping them from having themselves with kids, but how society handles the person for actually being what he/she is. I support the fight against child pornography, I support heavy penalties for rapists, but I also want the well being for everybody, even the "worst".
It's kinda hard for me to explain in english, but anyways ... heh.
[off]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerPuff Grrl
The rampant misogyny featured in most porn is appalling. Women are treated as just orifices for guys to fuck. Rarely do you ever see a woman come in any of them, instead the porn ends when the guy comes. And he usually comes on the face of the woman which is unbelieveably demeaning. If there ever is a porn that does feature a woman coming then it is treated as some freak show thing, usually when the woman ejaculates.
And that is just porn from the States, nothing compared to the misogyny in Hentai (Japanese animated porn).
Heh. I don't wanna seem like a sleazy pornofreak here, but there are enough pornovids where women come. It's a fact that many women enjoys blowing men and it's a fact that many women enjoy the taste of sperm. I'm NOT saying this goes for everyone. Far from it, but still, the porno industry is filled with people who work with this all the time. They are professional fuckers, literally In societies for different extremeties common things are looked upon as boring, and they search for new ways to enjoy themselves. Be it porn, music or art...

And I'd also like to say that the soft core part of the porno industry is bigger than the hard core part of it (as soft core includes most of the porno magazines, soft core movies, pin ups and what not -- where hard core simply doesn't fit in or isn't allowed). Soft core is by some looked upon as something beautiful, and hard core often shows some of the more things that aren't so pretty perhaps. There are something for every taste, for sure. And saying the whole industry is filled with the thought that women are items for men to use sexually isn't really fair. They have all chosen this line of work, and I don't think anyone is more of an item than others. What about all the gay porn out there? Lesbian-porn is a big business. Bigger than man-on-man at least. No men using women there... and again, women can have the dominating roles in movies. Most often they do ... if that's just the director feeding them lines (most probably it is) - who knows. Doubt anyone in here knows if it is or not.

(Heh, I wasn't sure where to stop, as I just started ranting on. Sorry. I might have gone tooooo off topic here )

Freddie: : There... a seperate thread for you pervs! (just kidding. )
~~~~~~~~~~~
What I Think Tank
I have started a blog that aims to concentrate its content on politics, economics and history, with a keen interest in American politics and the American tradition of Libertarianism and Austrian Economics.

Last edited by freddie; 02-06-2006 at 21:25.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 21:22   #15
haku haku is offline
iMod
 
haku's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Normandie
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,839

I have no time or inclination to enter that debate about porn, but i mostly agree with dradeel and rachel. I think that it's a myth that women are exploited or degraded in porn, they choose that line of work, they make good money, and many actually enjoy what they're doing, and many do like sperm (actresses who have a problem with it generally go for lesbian porn).
As for domination, it's not always women who are the submissive ones, there are loads of porn where men are the dominated ones and women are totally in charge (a quick search for "femdom" on any porn site will give you plenty of results).
And of course in gay or lesbian porn, there's no such issue since everybody is of the same gender.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Patrick | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ shortdickman@free.fr ]
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 21:25   #16
robbie robbie is offline
Moderator
 
robbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,170

LMAOO! I never saw this thread

Freddie: : It's a continuation of the dutch paedophile party thread... the topic went stray a bit, cause everybody was discussing the porn issue. So I created a seperate thread for it.
~~~~~~~~~~~
R | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ e-mail ]
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 23:53   #17
dradeel dradeel is offline
Green Eyed Demon
 
dradeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Socialist hell: Norway
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,302

Freddie - Just as well I guess. Hehe

haku -
~~~~~~~~~~~
What I Think Tank
I have started a blog that aims to concentrate its content on politics, economics and history, with a keen interest in American politics and the American tradition of Libertarianism and Austrian Economics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 23:55   #18
forre forre is offline
Primetime Anchor
 
forre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden/France
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,954

I got to rename the thread as words "porn, underage sex" are prohibited by many public browsers. It means that people won't be able to access the forum from the public place.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Olga | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ ritzer@hotmail.com ]

Latest News:
| Tatu gallery | Current News | News Archive
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 12:23   #19
Rachel Rachel is offline
Ice_Cream
 
Rachel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ипсщич, Суффолк, УК
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,831

Send a message via ICQ to Rachel Send a message via AIM to Rachel Send a message via MSN to Rachel Send a message via Yahoo to Rachel Send a message via Skype™ to Rachel
nath, about kids not being able to tell reality and movies apart - honestly I think if a kid can't do that then they were gonna be a little screwed in the head anyway. Obviously these kids would have had no common sense in the first place.

And about women being used and degraded - honestly I think it's the people who buy it who are the ones getting used. They are the ones paying $30 for a few hrs of excitement. It's them that are slaves to their desire. Porn hurts no one except the buyers wallet! (Unless we are talking about underage stuff, that is a whole different issue.)
~~~~~~~~~~~
Tatutaty: "Horny Rachel is her name. Masturbating is her game. Fucking, sucking, licking too. Wouldn't you like some Rachel screw? *batteries not included*"

PuddleQueen | Rachel | TatySite.net t.E.A.m. [ rm6405@hotmail.com ]

My music playlist on Last.fm
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2006, 12:26   #20
PowerPuff Grrl PowerPuff Grrl is offline
The Dream is Over, :~(
 
PowerPuff Grrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 682

Quote:
Originally Posted by dradeel
And saying the whole industry is filled with the thought that women are items for men to use sexually isn't really fair. They have all chosen this line of work, and I don't think anyone is more of an item than others. What about all the gay porn out there? Lesbian-porn is a big business.
But it is porn, what else are men in porn going to use women for?
I'm not arguing that that the industry is abusing women (maybe back in the seventies, certainly not now). Just that the images themselves and how it is structured is pretty sexist. But I think this is the one domain however, where sexism can in fact flourish seeing as how it is porn we're talking about. Everything is acted out, nobody is hurt, and the viewer knows beforehand what he will be watching. That and porn is about seeing sexual desire come to life. You can't repress that stuff, better it come out in porn than in reality.

I just think viewership should be strictly limited to adults. Children should be forming their first impressions of sex from schools rather than learning it first from porn.

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddie
With prohibiting anything we're basically telling our children that there are things out there which they wouldn't be able to understand properly. What we're doing is not trusting them to make up their own opinion on the matter.
They can't make up their mind on the matter without first learning about it under a balanced environment, in this case school. It's like learning how to drive by watching NASCAR racing, you have to go through the driving instruction courses first.

PS: dradeel, it wasn't your English it was just me being presumptuous about the whole paedophile thing. My apologies.
  Reply With Quote
ReplyPost New Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sci-Fi thread haku Sports and Entertainment 10 09-10-2005 09:14
Fake Tatu pics thread forre Questions to the Moderators 11 25-11-2004 22:25
The Yulia Loves Lena & Lena Loves Yulia Thread xena225 News and Events 119 05-01-2004 03:55
POLL::Official EuroVision Discussion Thread:: Part II (April 09- May 02) Willow71 News and Events 205 01-05-2003 00:37



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42.




© 2001-2008 Unofficial site of group TATU

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.