|
Unofficial forum of group TATU | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
Thread Tools |
20-03-2003, 21:37 | #21 |
Quality Control
Join Date: Jan 2003
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,875
|
I Don't Support It..
Although saying that, Saddam is the biggest tyrant to hold such a powerful position over a country and his day was bound to come sometime soon. Why not make it now before he gets the chance to Kill/Exile more of his own people or actually use those weapons he's been brewing for so damn long.
|
Reply With Quote |
20-03-2003, 23:58 | #22 | |
Божественная красота
|
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
21-03-2003, 01:59 | #23 |
Участник
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Romania
Posts: 550
|
Hm, this war had to be done, I hope in two weeks the coalition forces will enter in Bagdad and all is over ... oh, and the oil price will go down !!
|
Reply With Quote |
21-03-2003, 02:40 | #24 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Москва
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 778
|
My source
Quote:
My thoughts are not far-fetched... |
|
Reply With Quote |
21-03-2003, 02:49 | #25 |
The Dream is Over, :~(
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 682
|
Well, Bush said that he wants to restructure the Middle East with a Marshall-like Plan. Attacking Iraq and removing Saddam would be the gateway to that mission.
All I have to say is... alright. (Though they should've started with Saudi Arabia, IMHO.) If Bush honestly wants to create stable democratic countries in the Middle East, then I say grrrreat! However, history has proven that when it comes to selecting and installing leaders, America sucks ass. The US claims to have developed free-enterprise democracies but most of this development has come at the expense of the people's blood. Like what Charles said "Historically, the US has supported much worse regimes than Iraq as political allies." E.g.: Chile and Pinochet. More recently Afghanistan; the Northern Alliance is just as bad as the Taliban. As soon as the Western Media's attention diverted from Afghanistan the women were treated in the same demeaning manner. Even before then, the Taliban was supported by the US. The US tends to leave countries as soon as their purpose is served. And often, if not always, they leave them with dictators in charge. But I kind of have faith. Britain is by their side and they tend to kick ass when installing leaders. I hope that this war is short as hell and something good actually comes out of it. But I worry about the future of the UN. I never really liked the UN but it does serve some purpose. |
Reply With Quote |
21-03-2003, 04:47 | #26 |
Участник
Join Date: Dec 2002
Age: 24
Posts: 565
|
Pinochet made Chile one of the most prosperous counties in South America, when it was on the way of becoming another Cuba or Vietnam.
Then he stept down. goku, - that is al just one point of view. I heard completely different opinions. In any case- killing people is hardly an answer. |
Reply With Quote |
21-03-2003, 05:43 | #27 |
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Москва
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 778
|
Agreed. That is what I said in my preface...
|
Reply With Quote |
21-03-2003, 06:28 | #28 | |
Участник
Join Date: Dec 2002
Age: 24
Posts: 565
|
Quote:
|
|
Reply With Quote |
21-03-2003, 18:34 | #29 |
I'm a Dust Bunny!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montréal, Canada
Posts: 2,729
|
This isn't really a war. It's a massacre. (Well, that is if all the Iraqi soldiers don't surrender.)
One American death due to actual warmongering. Four American and twelve English deaths because of weather conditions. *Shrugs.* This will be over in less than a month. My father and I are guessing about two to three weeks. Maybe even less. I have no stance on the war. ~Echo. |
~~~~~~~~~~~
Quietly weaving, Tiredly leaving, Another today, Again tomorrow Together dismay, And raining sorrow. Le noir, la gloire... On se demande bien. Mais comm' je t'adore, lorsque je m'endors... |
|
Reply With Quote |
22-03-2003, 02:05 | #30 |
Прохожий
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1
|
And after the war? What will follow? The people there have nothing. I' ve heard that Bush had asked the UN, who wants to pay the reconstruction? Not the US! We have to pay, especially Germany! Because we always have to pay for such things! The US destroy everything ... and we have to pay! Super!
Fact is Bush doesn't want to help the people in the Iraq! It's not his first priority to take a mad man's weapon away to rescue the people from an dictatorship. He wants the oil! He wants the control! Most people here in Germany have this opinion! Bush is not much better than Hussein! He has also a lot of weapons, he doesn't care about the opinions of other states, and does what he wants! And Mr. Blair is so stupid! 96 % of the people in his country are against the war. The war won't hurt Hussein so much, just civilians will become hurt! And the future! A lot of people will escape from the Iraq, but they won't go to the US, no they will come to Europe, and to Germany...and if we would say no they would say...oh the nazis ( is that word right...I don't know!). I'm not a rassist, and we have a lot of people from differnt countries here, but Germany have no money for all these people...and not enough jobs. So what should we do? Of course war is not the answer! The US didn't have so many wars in the past like we in europe. Sometimes it seems so the they don't know what war means for the people there. And I believe, if the US win the war, the Iraq wouldn't accept the new head of state...you see just more trouble in the future! I don't want to be the bad girl! I'm just 17 years old and I hate war and the political way of Bush. (Sorry, I know my english is not he best. I hope you can understand it right.) |
Reply With Quote |
22-03-2003, 22:41 | #31 |
The Dream is Over, :~(
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 682
|
Tasiya, I agree with your concerns about the restructuring of Iraq. Funny, I always thought that US sharing that responsibility just showed that they still believe that international support is important.
However, when looking at it in a different perspective the UN always have done the groundwork for rebuilding shattered countries; the UN meaning everybody but the US. But with this situation the US cannot simply leave Iraq without the UN to look after it. After this war, Iraq can certainly become a hotspot for terrorist activities and the US cannot afford to have that happen. France won't even discuss the possibility of funding Iraq after the war, rightfully so. The US has managed to piss everybody off (even the most laid back country in the world, Canada) with their statements of not needing the UN (an organization they built) and now they have the audacity to ask for funding. This only illustrates that US is only diplomatic when it suits their needs - you may roll your eyes at how clichйd that statement is - it surprisingly happens less often then you would believe. I personally think the US and UK is in the right when attacking Iraq, not because I think they actually care for the well being for the Iraqi people. Fact is nobody cares, France won't attack Iraq, why would they? They built nuclear facilities for Saddam Hussien. Portions of Iraqi oil goes to France and Russia. I believe they are just as atrocious as the US and UK. France and Russia accept Iraqi goods despite funding a dictator. So toppling a dictator and restructuring an oppressed country is good in my eyes no matter how evil the intentions are. The problem isn't with Iraq anymore, it isn't even with how to restructure Iraq afterwards either. The problem now lies with filling in the gap the US and the UK has created with countries within the UN. The US cannot afford to go back into isolation, not after the globalized platform they have established now. Not after opening up so many trade benefits to so many places in the world. The anti-America attitude that is being acquired today does not come without justification. The US needs to change the bully image they have now with neglecting the UN and destroying diplomacy to the image they used to have when they estbalished the UN and created diplomacy. I swear to God I'll try to keep them short next time. |
Last edited by PowerPuff Grrl; 22-03-2003 at 22:54. |
|
Reply With Quote |
22-03-2003, 23:19 | #32 |
Участник
Join Date: Feb 2003
Age: 62
Posts: 310
|
Its all well and good to say the US must attack a dictatorship with an oppressive regime, but this doesn't hold up when you look at the whole world. If that is sufficient grounds to start a war, then how may more wars will we start? Is it any wonder that North Korea is upset?
The only reason Bush is getting away with this at all is that Iraq has zero allies that will come to their aid. You're correct about the gap between the US/UK and the rest of the UN. That must be fixed before Iraq can be rebuilt. The US cannot perform any peacekeeping duties after the war. No one would trust them. That must fall to UN forces. |
Reply With Quote |
22-03-2003, 23:47 | #33 |
The Dream is Over, :~(
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 682
|
Yeah, you're right about that.
I can name oher nations which need some intervention more than Iraq. But just because other countries need more help doesn't mean that sins of omission can be tolerated, even encouraged. Like what Bush said, Iraq is a gateway to reforming the Middle East. I think the reform doesn't end with Iraq. I just hope he was being honest with this because it is really hard to trust their foreign policy. Bush Sr. said that Kuwait would turn into a democratic nation after the Gulf War. I have heard recently that Kuwait is planning to become a theocracy. On a side note, Africa really needs some attention. And not the kind of attention that has massive funding involved because the people that truly need it do not see a penny of it. I have no idea why governments keep funding actually expecting progress. |
Reply With Quote |
24-03-2003, 20:20 | #34 |
The Chosen ONe
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Jersey, U.S.A
Age: 42
Posts: 633
|
Has Tatu commented on the war recently?
|
Reply With Quote |
01-04-2003, 12:08 | #35 |
Новенький
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: damas
Age: 43
Posts: 25
|
ok i think no one will be happy to see children killed and suffered in any place in this world
i think this war hasn't carry a peace and freedom to the iraq ppl this war is only for kill ,brother kill his brother and for what , it's only for oil fuck oil no more suffering for iraq ppl |
Reply With Quote |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
t.A.T.u remixes | tainted_chick | News and Events | 279 | 28-04-2011 18:46 |
t.A.T.u. полный финиш [плюс сканы] | Igor | Новости и события | 20 | 24-02-2007 20:07 |
Tatu in Hong Kong (Harbour Fest) October 2003 | skye | News and Events | 61 | 23-07-2006 07:27 |
t.A.T.u. on Radio Echo Moscow (Interview + New Songs) | forre | News and Events | 93 | 21-04-2004 22:05 |
::Article:: Strange dances with t.A.T.u. | forre | News and Events | 39 | 22-07-2003 06:23 |