View Single Post
Old 17-01-2006, 23:50   #53
spyretto spyretto is offline
My Waking Hour
 
spyretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: in oblivion
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,486

Quote:
Originally Posted by xmad
Can you really judge?
as you see :


The USA and Iran both of them are crazy,lets see what will happen. [/off]
The difference being that Iran is like that temporarily while the US is permanently. In fact they're the biggest disruptors/protectors of world peace. They disrupt peace in the first place to re-establish it later ( in their own terms of course, and according to the value of the dollar ).
And not to forget that the biggest threat to peace that our world is facing in the last 50+ years is the West's own creation. ( Israel )

Quote:
Israel could bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. They're worried that Iran could have usable nuclear devices within months. It probably wouldn't stop Iran getting the bomb eventually, but it would delay them a long time. Iran would retaliate with terrorism against Israel, but after Ahmedinejad's call to wipe Israel off the map, they don't want to take
chances.
That would be a picnic for the "allied forces" . Because Israel can retaliate on its own with its own nukes without the help of the U.S. And I doubt that the other Arab nations/Europeans would react to it other than condemning the move. ( as they usually do ). More innocent people will die for nothing and Dick Cheney will take the responsibility of rebuilding and remodernising Iran

Quote:
Bombing Iran's nuclear facilities would be an act of war, therefore whatever Iran would do to Israel in retaliation would not be terrorism, just a counter attack to an act of war.
It depends who does it. If the US does it, its an act of peace not war
  Reply With Quote